Categorized | Antivirus

Good or Bad: EU Government wants to prohibit others to read your electronic communication

When you put a letter in an envelope, close it and put it in a mailbox, you assume that the postal service will deliver the letter without opening and reading it. The content of letters in transport is protected in many countries around the world. And we all think this is how it should be. However, people start to send less and less letters and have moved to sending e-mails. In some countries, e-mail communication is even regarded as legal binding communication. So why do we not have similar rules for e-mail?

That e-mail is scanned by e-mail scanners for embedded malware, or for material declared unwanted by the recipient, of course is accepted practice and safeguards you against problems. But other scanners will scan and analyze the content and store the information. That information can then for instance be used to send you specific information or advertisements that possibly meet your “analyzed” interest. And a similar action can be done with chat programs or messages send through social networks.

The EU Parliament wants the EU Commission to come with proposals to end the unwanted and unsolicited reading of electronic information. That is a good start (better than nothing), but of course it still take years before this may be established and becoming an official EU Law. And then it will only be applicable to electronic communications in member countries of the EU. There are many more countries around the world where your electronic communications may pass and be scanned.

A law like this has to be crafted taking the scanning for legitimate purposes (malware, spam, unwanted content) into consideration. As the mail in both instances is scanned by machines and not humans, this distinction has to be made. Otherwise the law will be counter-productive, prohibiting even gateway solutions for protecting your infrastructure to scan or block incoming electronic communication.

Of course you can do something yourself here as well. Normally the bulk of the e-mail you send is to people you know. And there are plenty of open source of free encryption programs, even as plug-ins to most e-mail clients. And when your e-mails are encrypted, all they scanners can do is store how many e-mails you send and where.

 

Full story: Norman’s security blog

Related Posts

Comments are closed.

Security Status

Beware Facebook "Timeline" scams http://t.co/W5EW0cVv
4 months ago
Nigerian government (unknowingly) hosts phishing website http://t.co/uQd42ENw
4 months ago
PCMag Awards McAfee All Access its Editors’ Choice: SANTA CLARA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--McAfee today announced... http://t.co/FakV7Vd8
4 months ago
RT @mikko: I hadn't noticed Google Maps has added 3D models of buildings. Here's a (very accurate) view of F-Secure HQ in Helsinki http://t.co/IKfAZlak
4 months ago
North Koreans aren't known for their online presence. But others may be lured into clicking Kim Jong-Il 'videos' too http://t.co/yQOon6YT
4 months ago
How to Protect Your Professional Reputation on Facebook Timeline http://t.co/I4bcR2VN
4 months ago
This is pretty impressive from @Softpedia: Facebook scans 2 trillion link clicks and blocks 220 million posts each day http://t.co/vKsn9gNl
4 months ago
Need for integrated approach to security in industrial control systems - http://t.co/tPBCNOow with @PikeResearch
4 months ago
Some free-based music we play at work http://t.co/xu5agZfc
4 months ago
Japan’s cyber defense weapon: a virus. It includes quotes by @Luis_Corrons via @InfosecurityMag
4 months ago